Focus Area

Defense of Excessive Force and Civil Rights Claims

Allegations of excessive force and civil rights violations can lead to a federal lawsuit that names an officer personally.

These claims are typically brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, which allows a person to sue a government official for violating constitutional rights while acting in an official role. In use-of-force cases, the central question is usually whether the force was objectively reasonable under the Fourth Amendment, judged from the perspective of a reasonable officer on the scene rather than with the benefit of hindsight.

Much of the case often turns on the record created in and around the incident, including body camera and dash camera footage, reports, witness statements, and the findings of any internal or criminal review. Officers may also assert qualified immunity, a legal protection that can end a claim before trial when the conduct did not violate clearly established law.

Chelf Law reviews that record early and builds the defense around the facts as they were known to the officer at the time. Representation continues through motions, discovery, trial, and appeal in state and federal courts across Kentucky.

Officers seek representation for matters including:

Officers seek representation for matters including:

  • Fourth Amendment excessive force claims
  • Section 1983 civil rights lawsuits
  • Qualified immunity and other defenses to liability
  • Claims arising from in-custody deaths and serious injuries
  • Body camera and video evidence review
  • State law claims, including assault, battery, and negligence
  • Coordination with parallel administrative or criminal investigations